tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3626894894147080419.post4640911132589495200..comments2023-05-21T16:07:00.610+01:00Comments on TheJerseyWay: The BBC are on Program Cover Up!thejerseywayhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/02401815536804277436noreply@blogger.comBlogger9125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3626894894147080419.post-54356734629063853832012-10-09T23:41:31.064+01:002012-10-09T23:41:31.064+01:00
What an extraordinary addition your work is to th...<br />What an extraordinary addition your work is to the library of truth<br /><br />The other blogs and the forum PJ write words that although very topical and relevant will take a lot of work in the future to unravel.<br /><br />Your recorded contribution is there, real, in perfect time, logged and cannot be denied by the politicians. <br /><br />Possibly or probably in a few years time when there are knocks on the door and evidence needed, your work is outside of Government control.<br /><br />The perfect record.<br /><br />Excellent<br /><br />Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3626894894147080419.post-49448676721941760112012-10-09T23:02:28.443+01:002012-10-09T23:02:28.443+01:00Hi Anon..
Lenny Harper on Channel 4, can you tell...Hi Anon..<br /><br />Lenny Harper on Channel 4, can you tell me details.<br /><br />TJW.thejerseywayhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/02401815536804277436noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3626894894147080419.post-44204130696783247402012-10-09T21:28:25.580+01:002012-10-09T21:28:25.580+01:00http://www.bbc.co.uk/5live/
Lenny Harper on tonig...http://www.bbc.co.uk/5live/<br /><br />Lenny Harper on tonight after 10.30pm can you record it you star.<br /><br />rico sordahttps://www.blogger.com/profile/09370637157786202673noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3626894894147080419.post-86711382195122921612012-10-09T21:21:06.666+01:002012-10-09T21:21:06.666+01:00Will you be covering and recording Lenny Harper on...Will you be covering and recording Lenny Harper on Channel 4? His could be a big story off the Island.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3626894894147080419.post-59055557067006863892012-10-09T19:40:17.272+01:002012-10-09T19:40:17.272+01:00One day you will see how important it is that you ...<br />One day you will see how important it is that you archived this evidence on line. Any one researching the history of this sad coverup can find this blog and be able to make up there own mind not depending on what State Media decides we should believe. Don't give up.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3626894894147080419.post-91077278936033794192012-10-09T16:23:18.311+01:002012-10-09T16:23:18.311+01:00Some of those commenters have some BALLSSome of those commenters have some <a href="http://therightofreply.blogspot.com/2012/10/chamber-of-horrors-gasp-at-truth.html" rel="nofollow">BALLS</a>Big Ehttps://www.blogger.com/profile/15228210750484725153noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3626894894147080419.post-12079450253966922412012-10-09T08:50:48.554+01:002012-10-09T08:50:48.554+01:00Some of the media appear to miss the point of inve...Some of the media appear to miss the point of investigating child abuse that has happened some time ago, especially when the perpetrator has died, but the bigger issue is to ensure it is not continued.<br /><br />Those who knew of a perpetrator of child abuse and either allowed them to avoid being charged, or helped them conceal it (because they were also one!) or wanted it covered up for other reasons, they are just as guilty as the perpetrators for concealing, their silence does not give the abuse victim any closure and lets other abusers think its okay, if I get caught my mate will not let anything happen to me. Worse still, would be those who not only know and cover up, but then use that knowledge to blackmail someone into doing something they may not have wished to have done.<br /><br />A full COI with the strongest TOR is what is required in Jersey and those guilty should be locked up as an example!! <br /><br />There may well be many abuse victims who may not have any recourse as the abuser may be dead, but they may get an element of closure if it was found that their earlier complaints were not dealt with correctly due to a cover up. A strong investigation, may find that the person who helped cover up had a hidden secret as well, and so on.<br /><br />Anyone who says why bother with Savile, educate them. Cover ups are wrong and perhaps an AG could be complicit in such a cover up by claiming there was insufficient evidence or not in the public interest, whereas there may well have been sufficient evidence but was not in the interest of some people. <br /><br />Anyone who says attitudes were different in the 1970's is either a child abuser or a child abuser cover up merchant.<br /><br />I know of a person who was (16) charged for having under-age consensual sex with his 14 year old girlfriend and put on probation because her father did not like him. She was reluctant to admit anything.<br /><br />The year was 1975.<br /><br />So in 1975 when Savile was 49yrs old, interfering/raping girls non consensually, we are asked to believe it was okay, what planet are these people on!!!!<br /><br />I do agree that it was different then, in as much as it was more likely to be covered up then than it is now. So bring on the openess, bring on those who now know they will be listened too, tell the world if you know of a cover up.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3626894894147080419.post-1186157163675137002012-10-09T00:03:55.976+01:002012-10-09T00:03:55.976+01:00http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2214785/Fr...http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2214785/Freddie-Starr-forced-admit-mistaken-TV-footage-unearthed-1974.htmlAnonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3626894894147080419.post-40725543401903882632012-10-08T22:26:52.632+01:002012-10-08T22:26:52.632+01:00You could not pay me to ask such a preposterous qu...You could not pay me to ask such a preposterous question, even if ordered to by my employer. Why doesn't BBC ask if it is fair to deprive charities of all the future additional funds which might be deliberately raised from deliberately engaging in child sexual exploitation? <br /><br />The highly credible accusations of his accusers do not harm Jimmy Savile, in any way. He is dead. He escaped accountability even though he had already spoken publicly about his philosophy of sexual exploitation of underage girls and even gleefully admitted to his own perverse inclinations. He has defended Gary Glitter's use of child porn - some of which featured toddlers. He has lied about Haut de la Garenne. The public can now listen to recordings of his inappropriate touching of a young girl. That will remain a dominant part of his permanent legacy. A retrospective study of his words and behavior would indicate a sexually predatory mindset even without taking recent allegations and witness accounts into consideration.<br /><br />The BBC question is appalling. The more ethical question is whether it is trying to justify abuse it concealed and even permitted as something best buried. There is just something so tellingly close to abuse justification displayed in their choice of words.<br /><br />Elle<br /><br />Anonymousnoreply@blogger.com