Statement From our Great Chief Minister.

This was a bit of a surprise but did it go far enough !





What do you think ?

Question 9. In the States Today 30/11/10.

I am sorry about the sound interference on the Audio, it was out of my control.

9. The Deputy of St. Martin will ask the following question of the Chief Minister –



“Given that the explanations given as to why and when the Napier Terms of Reference were altered refer to decisions taken after R.39/2010 was presented to the States, will the Chief Minister inform Members when this was done and who was party to the decision and explain why he and the Deputy of St. Martin were not party to the discussions?”

Speech By Deputy P Le Claire.

It took some time but Credit to the Deputy for standing up & saying what he heard in the corridor's of power. But is there more !





I think we havn't heard the last of this saga.

Interview's about Stuarts unjust Imprisonment.

First we had Emma Martins our Data Protection Officer.





Second interview was with Mr J Hemming MP.





Third interview was with Paul Rolly a BBC political correspondent.





Forth Interview is with the Man himself Ex Senator Stuart Syvret, after his release.





You do get the feeling that the BBC Interviewer’s have so much contempt for Stuart & his fight for justice it makes you wonder if the radio station is owned by the States of Jersey, Not the public of Jersey.
Radio Jersey will do anything to discredit the likes of Stuart & anyone that does not toe the Government Line. No wonder the station is losing out to Radio 103fm & may it continue because in the end the BBC will have to have a really good look at the way it is run.
First thing to do is get rid of Hamish on the phone in, its more like a Listen to me show then a program for the people of this Island to say what they want. Within reason. Go do some of those really important Wine programs for the 60,000 winos over hear. Or go & talk to Dr Gellar she like wine.
Well I'm not even going to start to say anything about the JEP.

I would just like to say at the start of all this I was not in any doubt that Stuart was going to be on a very long & hard road & it sure has been for him. But in his time some 20 years in the States of Jersey he has been right so many times about what is going on behind the scene's over here, I would say he has got them bang to rights on this one as well. I would be surprised if there was one person that has lived on this rock of over thirty years & never had the thought "that was wrong how did that happen" & " something is corrupt about that".

You have to keep it up now & go all the way to the European Court of Human Rights.
I heard that you were very good in Court, so good that you made him look like the Carpenter. The day that they let you stand up in court & show them that you are not going to lie down & die was the start of the end. For them.

By the way how is it that one Judge didn't give you Bail, but the one in the Royal court does!

Good Luck Stuart.

Questions in the States 16/11/10.

1. The Deputy of Grouville will ask the following question of the Chief Minister –



“Given that during Oral Question Time on 3rd February 2009 the Chief Minister said that he would endeavour to find out whether there were written guidelines or policies relating to the taking of notes at suspensions and the shredding of those notes before the typewritten minutes were agreed, will he inform Members whether such guidelines exist and, if they do not, will he state why no guidelines have been implemented?”




3. Deputy T.M. Pitman of St. Helier will ask the following question of the Chief Minister –



“Given that on 12th October 2010 the Chief Minister informed Members that disciplinary action would be dealt with through normal procedures, will he inform Members whether disciplinary action has been taken in relation to the Napier findings, and if so, what has been the outcome?"



4. Deputy of St. Martin will ask the following question of the Chief Minister –



“In his answer to an oral question on 19th October 2010 about the altering of the Napier Terms of Reference, the Chief Minister advised that they were altered when it was established that the previous Chief Officer of Police would fully participate in the investigation, will the Minister inform Members how this willingness was communicated and, if by letter, when this was received?”





10. Deputy M. Tadier of St. Brelade will ask the following question of the Chief Minister –



“Will the Chief Minister confirm that Mr Napier was invited to come to Jersey to present his report to States Members and, if so, will he state when this was and why he has not yet come over?”





16. Deputy of St. Martin will ask the following question of the Chief Minister –



“In view of the fact that during oral question time on 30th June 2009, the Chief Minister agreed that States Members should apologise when they make allegations against individuals that are not substantiated, will the Chief Minister inform Members whether he has asked the Minister for Home Affairs to apologise for allegations made against the former Chief Officer of the States of Jersey Police, and, if not why not?”

Who is the Real Chief Minister.

VFC. I had to find The audio & I have. Better late then never.

Well Who is the real Chief Minister! Has to be Bill Ogley he's un touch able.
This is the audio of Deputy T. Pitman's question to our Chief Minister in the States sitting on the 19/01/10.

Very interesting indeed. It's good to go over these questions, because you do forget what was said & the Chief Minister forget's what he has said!

Questions in the States 2/11/10.

4. The Deputy of St. Mary will ask the following question of the Chief Minister –
“The Napier Report (paragraph 67) records that the Solicitor General advised the Director of
Human Resources – “I would urge that particular caution be exercised to check that there are
no provisos or caveats to any of the conclusions reached upon which reliance is to be placed”;
would the Chief Minister informs members why this advice was not followed and when he
considers it is acceptable to ignore repeated legal advice?”





10. The Deputy of St. Martin will ask the following question of the Chief Minister –
“Will the Chief Minister assist Members when debating proposition P.166/2010 by agreeing
to release the confidential e-mail he sent to the Deputy of St. Martin at 21.03 on Monday 27th
September 2010 with the heading ‘Napier’, if not, why not.




16. The Deputy of St. Mary will ask the following question of the Minister for Home Affairs –
“What was the basis on which the then Deputy Chief Officer of the States of Jersey Police
commissioned the report from the Metropolitan Police on 27th August 2008, was the advice
of ACPO followed in the commissioning of this report, and does the Minister consider that
use of that report, as detailed in the Napier report, was consistent with best practice and has it
damaged relations with the Metropolitan Police?”

Statement from Minister of Education.

From last week the Statement from our Education Minister Deputy J Read.




Questions from the Statement.

Questions in the States 19/10/10.

2. The Deputy of St. Mary will ask the following question of the Chief Minister –



“Can the Chief Minister explain why, during the time the suspension or disciplinary action against the Chief Officer of States of Jersey Police was being discussed and prepared behind the scenes, there was no formal attempt to resolve the issues between the Minister for Home Affairs, senior officers who had concerns, and the former Chief Officer of States of Jersey Police?”





9. The Deputy of St. Martin will ask the following question of the Chief Minister –



“Will the Chief Minister inform Members why part (d) of the Terms of Reference relating to the former Police Chief’s sworn Affidavit and published in the comments to P.9/2010 and in the Jersey Evening Post on 26th March 2010, was removed from the Napier Report and advise who was responsible and, given the Affidavit’s relevance to the suspension, why Members were not party to the decision to amend the Terms?”






15. The Deputy of St. Martin will ask the following question of the Minister for Home Affairs –



“In light of the criticism in the Napier Report of the Acting Chief Officer of the States of Jersey Police, will the Minister be undertaking disciplinary action against this Officer in order to demonstrate consistency and does the Minister still have confidence in the said Officer’s integrity and suitability to continue in Office despite his imminent retirement?”






23. Deputy M. Tadier of St. Brelade will ask the following question of the Chief Minister –



“Given that the Chief Minister stated that the initial suspension of the Chief Officer of the States of Jersey Police, which was heavily criticised in the Napier report, was justified in light of the Wiltshire Report submitted a year later, can he confirm whether ‘the end justifies the means’ is now an accepted principle of his administration, and, if so, in which other areas this will be applied?”

Speeches you Don't get to Hear.

Property and Infrastructure Regeneration: the States of Jersey Development Company Limited.

1. Our Chief Minister, say's it with out thinking!




2. Deputy Rondel say's it as he see's it!




3. Deputy Winberly Just say's it!
Sorry about the interferance.



Does anyone have a Request, this could be a good laugh.

Questions in the States 12/10/10.

The Connétable Simon Crowcroft asking a reasonable question to the Chief Minister.





The Deputy T. Pitman asking the Chief Minister if anyone is to be Disciplined, over the unlawfull suspension of our Chief of Police.

Reaction from the Napier Report.

The Interview of Deputy Bob Hill & Chief of police Mr Graham Power By Chris Rayner on BBC Radio Jersey just after 5 this evening.

Both are having to correct Chris & say that there was a Conspiracy in getting rid of him. With meetings going on for months before the suspension happened.

Both BBC & the Channel Report news tonight said that this report says that there was NO Conspiracy?

This will not be the end of this sorry story.

The new Season.

Just like to say that now that the Funny Season is coming to a end & a new season is 11 days away. There will loads to lisen to. I will do my best to bring you as much as I can.
This is it now the long run in to the 2011 Eletions, who will be more vocal then normal, who will bring in something like Free percription's !
Already we have old Ted Vibert on the Radio every day saying what people want to hear, did not no him before but seeing him perform at the last Hustings. If that is the new JDA way, I think he should stay at home with his wife.
Will Guy defaye try to make a come back, WHAT A WAST OF SPACE.

I can't be bovered to carry on with my run down, its to depressing.
If I was that way inclined I would stand. But I am of the thinking that you should be a perfessional person with a good clear speaking skill, not someone that gets tied up in knots when asked "what time is it". Like some. I all so think that there should be just one class of member, be it Deputy or Senator with a Island wide mandate. No Constables they can be a member as long as they get elected as a Deputy or Senator as well.
We should not be haveing someone as a Minister or assistant Minister who has not been though an Election process or got in to the States on the back of 200 votes. Also I think we can get rid of at least 4 Member's & finaly they should be Paid no less then £65,000.00 per year with pension, so we can get more professional people in there. At the minute people who we could do with are not going to work for less.

Discuss ?

Chief of Police Mr Graham Power QPM.

The Interview of Chief of Police Mr Graham Power QPM, by Chris Stone of our
Jersey Radio.

Sounds more convincing then our Minister. He puts his Priority on the Survivors
of Child Abuse, not like our Home Affair's Minister, Old Frank Walker & the Bailiff that are only thinking of Jersey's image!!

Chief of Police Mr Graham Power QPM.

The Interview of Chief of Police Mr Graham Power QPM, by Chris Stone of our
Jersey Radio.
Sounds more convincing then our Minister. He puts his Priority on the Survivors
of Child Abuse, not like our Home Affair's Minister, Old Frank Walker & the Bailiff that are only thinking of Jersey's image!!

Click on the Title above.

Just a Test.

Senator Ian Le Marquand.

Been asked to put up the speech by Senator Le Marquand.

I think its getting a bit to much for him. I hope he has got some really damaging stuff on our Chief of Police or he will be in a place were I think he will have to go.

Ow wot a sandal.

Click on the Title above. Is this a person that is in control.

Question 13. 06/07/10.

Had a Special request.

13. The Deputy of St. Martin will ask the following question of the Minister for Home Affairs –



“Would the Minister advise whether the two police officers, who were suspended for around 18 months and then subsequently cleared of all disciplinary charges at a hearing on 23rd February 2010, are now back to full operational duties and if not, why not?”

Just click on the Title. This just feals like a sunday radio show.

Question 2. 06/07/10

2. Deputy T.M. Pitman of St. Helier will ask the following question of the Minister for Home Affairs –
“Will the Minister advise whether the alleged author of the Metropolitan (Met) Police Interim Report is himself under investigation by the Met regarding alleged anomalies in the report’s construction and whether the author neglected to interview crucial witnesses who could have refuted allegations made by the Former Deputy Chief Officer against the former Senior Investigating Officer and the suspended Chief Officer of the States of Jersey Police?”

You can listen to the above question by clicking on the Title.

Question 11

Question from Deputy of St Martin to the Minister of Health.

Has a Surgeon that was surspended Feb 2009 been de skilled.

If you would like to hear this Click the Title above.

If you would like to hear other Question's please let me know.

I would also like to hear some feed back, is this needed or does the local Media keep you informed enought. I Know there are people around the would that follow Jersey's local Bloggers, so what do you think about whats written in them?

Thanks.

Question 4 22/06/10

Question From Deputy Tadier to the Home Affairs Minister, about Who does he get his advice from in connection with the Chief of Police's Suspension.

Click on the Title above.

Been asked to put these up first will go through them all in time.

Thanks.

Question 1

First Question today by Deputy T. Pitman to Home Affairs Minister Senator Ian La Marquand.
Click on the Title.

Home Affairs Minister

One for Rico Sorda.
The Questions to the Home Affairs Minister, Senator Ian Le Marquand.
Asked by Deputy Trevor Pitman, Deputy Bob Hill & Deputy Danial Wimberley. On the 08/06/10. I think you've printed all this but I think the people who are following your Blog around the world, may like to hear the Audio of how it went.
Sorry for the poor quality, that was out of my hands.
I'll strive to do better in the future.

Click on the Title above.

St Helier Hustings

If you would like to lisen to Stuart Syvret's 5 Minute Speech, Clik on the title.
"St Helier Hustings".
This will be the first of many recordings that I have done.

Stuart's Public Meeting

I just had to write something, as being “one of that lot” that when to Stuart Syvret’s Parish Hall meeting on Monday 17th of May. Makes me able to comment about it, unlike some who think they can just dismiss it & comment about it on our local radio station or write on our only paper’s web site with out even of gone to the meeting.
I was quiet surprised & I think the majority of the people there was at how many there was that had taken time out on a Monday night to come & listen to Stuart.
It was near full with people standing at the back. I would of said over 200 was more like the number, not the biased 120 that the JEP said in the paper.
Stuart talked for about 20 minutes & Mark Forskitt for about 10 minutes. Which was done very well, said what he had been doing in England, in collecting information & evidence. Then they started with Questions, which is when the man got up & asked a question that Stuart had just spent the last 20 minutes telling.
There was about 90 minutes of questions which to be of matter of fact with not many long gaps. At the end Stuart & Mark got a standing ovation & people made there way home, a few people stopped to talk but not many. Did not see the egg thrown outside at people.
Over all it was a very good meeting with Stuart putting his point over very well & answering all the question’s that were asked. He had some literature printed off from his Blogg site that was very useful for all the people that don’t use a computer. I would say this needs to be done more, for the truth to get to the people who say “I will not read his Blog” but they may just read something on a sheet of paper.
As for the Media well what can you say apart from corupt waste of space. The BBC just didn’t go & Channel turned up recorded most of the meeting but have decided, that “there was nothing news worthy to but out on there news program”. Well doesn’t that just sum it all up, in that one sentence. All we get is spin & b*ll sh*t.
If it had been a flop with not many people there or with all the question against him, it would have been on all news bulletins & even the BBC would of paid channel for the footage so they could have had it on all there news bulletins. That’s how it works over here in Zimbarsey.
This is the start the next part in our fight for the truth is the by-election, in which some people are asking for that nice man Senator Perchard to stand against him? How does that work. Wouldn’t he have to resin to stand against Stuart! Hope he does because he will not get in, he wont get in next year when it’s he’s time for re-election. He is so up he’s ar*e & for telling people to go kill themselves there is no excuse for that language at all.

Could go on & on.