Questions without Answers 08/10/13.

6.  Deputy M.R. Higgins of St. Helier will ask the following question of H.M. Attorney General –

 “How does he reconcile evidence given by H.M. Solicitor General under oath in the 2008 Royal
Court Curtis Warren abuse of process hearing, that he was not mislead by any of the police
officers involved in the investigation (later repeated in a 2011 Privy Council statement) with the
written statement to the Operation Invicta investigation alleging that the Law Officers
Department were mislead by the States of Jersey Police?”

8. Deputy T.M. Pitman of St. Helier will ask the following question of the Chairman of Privileges 

and Procedures Committee – 

 

 “Would the Committee agree to review the current operation of Standing Order 109(7), which 

relates to the removal of the names of individuals named within the course of States questions or 

debates, to ensure it is operating adequately?” 

9. Senator S.C. Ferguson will ask the following question of the Minister for Health and Social 

Services– 

 

 “Would the Minister outline the negotiations which have taken place with staff in the pathology 

laboratory and advise whether the significant number of recent press releases has been 

considered appropriate to this process?” 

12. Deputy S. Pitman of St. Helier will ask the following question of the Minister for Health and 

Social Services – 

 

 “What is the average waiting time for an appointment to see a psychologist?” 

13. Deputy T.M. Pitman of St. Helier will ask the following question of the Chief Minister - 

 

 “Will the Chief Minister explain what the difference is between a ‘criminal’ breach of the Data 

Protection (Jersey) Law 2005 and a so-called ‘regulatory’ breach?” 

14. Deputy M.R. Higgins of St. Helier will ask the following question of the Minister for Home 

Affairs – 

 

 “Will the Minister reconcile his written answer on 10th September 2013, confirming that the 

disciplinary action against three officers involved in car bugging in the Curtis Warren case was 

brought by the Deputy Chief Officer of the States of Jersey Police, with that same officer’s 

statement to the Disciplinary Hearing conducted by the Chief Constable of Durham Constabulary 

that he was not the complainant but it was H.M. Attorney General?” 

TheJerseyWay would like to Credit & Thank BBC Radio Jersey for making these recording's possible.